Scientific Cultural Intelligence Framework
Hofstede-enhanced methodology with modern AI governance research to assess cultural dimensions across 26+ global contexts
40+ years of cultural research
AI governance specific adaptations
26+ cultural contexts validated
Measurable risk assessments
Cultural Dimensions Assessment Framework
Comprehensive evaluation of cultural factors that influence AI governance effectiveness and acceptance
Power Distance Index (PDI)
Measures how cultures handle inequality and hierarchy. High PDI cultures may accept centralized AI governance, while low PDI cultures prefer distributed control.
Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
Assesses individual vs group focus. Individualistic cultures prioritize personal data rights, collectivistic cultures emphasize community benefit.
Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI)
Evaluates tolerance for ambiguity. High UAI cultures demand strict AI regulations, low UAI cultures prefer flexible governance frameworks.
Long-term Orientation (LTO)
Measures future vs present focus. Long-term cultures invest in AI development, short-term cultures prioritize immediate governance compliance.
Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
Assesses competitive vs cooperative values. Masculine cultures drive AI advancement, feminine cultures focus on AI safety and ethics.
Indulgence vs Restraint (IVR)
Evaluates impulse control and gratification. Indulgent cultures embrace AI innovation, restrained cultures emphasize AI control and limitation.
Apply Our Methodology to Your AI Strategy
Leverage proven cultural intelligence to eliminate the 67% failure rate in global AI deployments